5Most Popular Articles

To Research or Not To Research?
Lorena | 22nd Jun | 7 comments
Great Marriage Advice
Dr. Isabella Santorini | 22nd Jun | 5 comments
Save Money, Work from Home, But Be Ready for Mobile Challenges
Stephanie Calahan | 25th Jun | 4 comments
Are You a Single Mom Who Wears a Wedding Ring to Work?
Rachel Sarah | 30th Jun | 3 comments
The riskiest thing you can do is be safe
Lorena | 11th Jul | 3 comments
Express Yourself!
Featured Blogs
Work It, Dad!
The Birthday Party Curse
The Working Closet
A Virtual Rainbow of Laptop Bags
Milk and Cookies
Great baby products for new parents
Single Mom at Work
Judgment and the Single Mom
Moms On Issues
Do you feel guilty when you leave your kids for a trip? Or do you do the Carlton dance?
The Work It, Mom! Blog
Telling the truth about parenting to my childless friends
Full Time, All the Time
To blackberry or not blackberry: that is the question
Explore Work It, Mom!

Why Working Moms Should Feel Great About Themselves

First in a series from the author of "The Feminine Mistake"

Rating: 4.9 (based on 10 reviews)
Sign up or Log in to rate!

We all know it’s not easy being a working mom. All too often, mothers who work outside the home feel conflicted and apologetic about their choice, even when it’s dictated by financial necessity. All too rarely do they receive the kind of validation and support they deserve. Between the stress, the guilt and the sheer physical demands of juggling family and job, most of us have days when we wonder why our lives have to be so complicated.

Well, it’s time to take heart! As The Feminine Mistake makes clear, working mothers are, in most cases, doing the best possible thing for their children by contributing to the family income and maintaining their own financial viability. This series will highlight some of the surprising research I uncovered when writing the book.

Prepare to pat yourself on the back -- you have lots of excellent reasons to feel good about the choice you’ve made!

REASON NUMBER ONE: Working Women Are Happier

The media constantly harp on the stress of the juggling act and the relief women supposedly feel when they opt out of the work force. It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the grass is greener on the soccer mom’s side of the fence, where stay-at-home mothers are free to devote all their time to children and home. Would working women be happier if they gave up the hassles of balancing job and family in favor of baking cookies and planting daffodils?

In fact, they probably wouldn’t -- not even in the short run, and almost certainly not over the long haul. As demonstrated in The Feminine Mistake, the truth about life as a full-time homemaker is very different from all that retrograde hype about the joys of opting out.

Contrary to popular mythology, decades of social science research have consistently shown that working mothers are happier and less anxious than stay-at-home moms; those cliches about desperate housewives fighting depression and substance abuse turn out to contain a good deal of truth. Moreover, when full-time homemakers return to paid work outside the home, their mental and emotional health improves significantly.

For example, one study found that women who had a child and stayed in the work force showed no increase in psychological distress -- but women who had a child and dropped out of the work force experienced a major increase in stress.

The boredom and lack of satisfaction experienced by many stay-at-home mothers are troubling enough when their children are young, but the problem becomes acute as the kids get older. Wrapped up in their own lives, teenagers assert their independence; husbands are busy with their careers. At this stage in life, stay-at-home moms may find the empty nest traumatic indeed, whereas working mothers with rewarding careers have ample opportunities for positive reinforcement outside the home.

Sure, it’s a logistical challenge to manage job responsibilities along with household tasks, especially while your children are young. But working women derive a wide range of intellectual, creative and social as well as monetary benefits from their jobs. You’d never know it from all the cultural propaganda that encourages women to sacrifice their careers, but the truth is that multiple roles in life are good for women’s psychological health.

REASON NUMBER TWO: Working Women Are HealthierAs a working mother, you never have enough time, you often feel as if you can’t do your best at home or on the job, and you have so many other responsibilities that taking care of yourself often gets relegated to the bottom of the to-do list. It’s hard not to envy those stay-at-home moms who seem to have time to work out and take a regular yoga class -- and it seems logical to assume that full-time homemakers, having unloaded the demands of the labor force, would be healthier than all of us frazzled working moms.

About the Author: Leslie Bennetts is a veteran journalist and the author of the national best-seller, The Feminine Mistake: Are We Giving Up Too Much? Her book was named one of the best books of the year by The Washington Post and is now out in paperback. Widely hailed as a must-read for women of all ages, this controversial book documents the benefits of work and the risks of economic dependency for women who give up their jobs to become full-time homemakers. She is a long time Vanity Fair magazine writer and is a mother of two teenagers.
Rating: 4.9 (based on 10 reviews)
Sign up or Log in to rate!
Help us spread the word. Submit to:
Please sign into your account or join Work It, Mom! to leave a comment.
Comments
I know I'm a little late to the party, but I just had to leave a comment here. By way of background, I have a 4 1/2 year-old and have been working part-time for pay since he was born. I'm ramping up to full-time this fall. I live in an upper middle class suburb. About 80% of my female friends and acquaintances from my town are SAHMs (ranging from late 20s - early 40s). ALL of them are affluent with at least a Bachelor's Degree. In the 4 1/2 years that I've ben in their circle, very few of my SAHM friends have done anything to keep, develop or enhance their career skills. I don't think any of them intend to ever rejoint the job market. Last spring, one of our circle recently lost her husband in a terrible accident. She left the workforce 8 years ago when her first child was born and did nothing to maintain contacts or keep her work skills fresh. Her husband left some life insurance, but little else. She had to find a job in a hurry and is in a low-level mall retail job. Thankfully, her family can help her. However, she has two young girls to support and no currently marketable skills. She's afraid that she's going to lose her house, that she won't be able to afford college, etc. This is exactly the situation that Leslie is cautioning against. Believe me, after some of the juggling weeks I've had, I've certainly considered leaving the workforce (at least for awhile). However, when I think about my friend's predicament, I'm so glad that I kept my hand in the game. It would be horrible to lose my husband. However, I know that I can support myself and my son. I would not lose my house and his education would be reasonably assured.
Becky  17th Mar
Leslie,

I'm concerned that you find a discussion with intelligent women depressing. I understand the need to pat each other on the back, but your approach seems to do that only at the expense of a perceived group of "others." Mothers who "work for pay" don't shuttle their children to activities, bake cookies or plant daffodils? Clichés and stereotypes only serve to polarize, not bring together.

You said in your book that at-home mothers:

1) are "infantilized by dependency"
2) make "childish decisions"
3) are "willfully obtuse Pollyannas who insist that mommy-track employees are as valuable as full-time careerists"
4) that Simone de Beauvoir was right -- these women are parasites, and
5) "all too many mothers are demonstrating for their children is that 'woman is the n***** of the world'"

Can you really say those things and expect readers to not take offense?

The fatal flaw in your approach is that it assumes only two distinct categories of mothers exist -- 1) those who work for pay full time and 2) everyone else. In fact, there are probably as many and as varied work arrangements as there are mothers.

True, some mothers work in offices for 40, 50 or 60 hours a week, while some mothers spend all of their time unpaid and at home. And, yes, some of the wealthy mothers you mentioned in your book employ nannies and housekeepers, and they, as you said, "may not be working for pay, but their tennis lessons, hair and manicure appointments, shopping dates, volunteer commitments, and social engagements frequently keep them out of the house for longer hours than many of the working mothers I know."

However, those two groups make up a fraction of the whole.

Many mothers work in schools, hospitals, daycares and studios. Some work the night shift or take on-call hours so they can be home during the day. Some work part time or on assignment for weeks or months at a time and are "out of work" until the next project is lined up. Some are in the military. Some take care of other people's children along with their own. Some "shift gears" in their work schedules to spend extra time and attention on special-needs children and ill or elderly family members. (Fathers do all of these things too.)

Some mothers were fired when they became pregnant. Some weren't hired again because they were pregnant. Some mothers returned to work after a few weeks of maternity leave only to be squeezed out of their jobs. Some mothers get turned down for jobs because they are mothers -- employers don't want what they believe is the added expense of health insurance, and they believe mothers are unreliable.

Truth is, we don't live in Scandinavia or even, oh, Vietnam (where guaranteed, paid maternity leaves range from four to six months). Employees have very few rights in the United States. They aren't even guaranteed vacation time. If they get it, they're lucky. The United States has no law requiring employers to offer any paid leave.

Your basic message that mothers should protect themselves financially is a good one. But you can't shoot poison darts at them -- calling them childish, obtuse and worse -- and expect them to see past that to your message that you truly want to help them. (And I believe you do.) Whatever position they're in -- whether by choice or circumstance -- it's a good bet they're not there on a whim. Mothers struggle every day to do right by themselves and their children.

Instead of focusing on "mistakes" mothers make, why not focus on changing the structure of the workplace and our nation's policies?
Why on earth do you think I am criticizing anyone for working part-time or working at home, which I do myself, btw? Nowhere have I ever made any such criticism, which is entirely beside the point anyway. The issue here is working FOR PAY and being able to support yourself, and your kids. It doesn't matter where you're doing that or on what schedule, only that you are able to take immediate financial responsibility for yourself and your children if need be. I am having a really hard time understanding why you (and others) are accusing me of having said things I've never said, and taking offense accordingly at some imagined insult. I also know perfectly well how much work it is to run a household, make three family meals a day and raise children, having had two myself. I am not in any way implying that SAHMs don't work hard. All moms and homemakers work hard, but that is quite beside the point if your husband dies or leaves and you suddenly can't buy groceries for your kids or get anyone to hire you or take them to a doctor when they're sick, because you can't afford health insurance. I couldn't care less whether anyone makes decisions like the ones I made. In researching my book I inteviewed women in every "category" -- SAHM, working full-time, working part-time, working at home, divorced, single, widowed, married, old, young, rich, poor, white, black, immigrant, etc. Hundreds of former and current SAHMS have told me what a disaster it was for them to have given up paid work and found themselves unable to get a decent job when they suddenly needed to, whether because a husband got sick, lost his job, died, left or whatever. My reporting plus a half century's worth of social science research, changes in the law, medical and psychological research on women, child development research and a host of other information convinced me that women are taking a terrible chance in becoming SAHMs, unless maybe they're heiresses with large trust funds. Why is it considered controversial or offensive to suggest that women inform themselves about the practical risks of this choice and plan accordingly?
It is clear from Ms. Bennetts other writings that when sher talks about "working moms" she means mothers like her who made decisions like she made. Those of us who work at home or mother at home don't fall into her category.

While Ms. Bennetts thinks this discussion is "depressing," it is depressing to me that we mush continue to have this debate.

The "FACTS" get interpreted differently by different people. Just as we don't want a one-size-fits-all life for our children, we don't want it for ourselves, either.

I've worked the 80-zillion hour work week and did it for over two decades. I've proven my education was worthwhile and that I am capable of a variety of professional jobs. If I want to work at home now and do it part-time, I don't want someone else lecturing me about the "facts."
I cannot begin to describe how depressing this entire discussion is to me. So many women continue to treat this whole issue as if it's just a matter of personal choice in which one person's opinion or decision is as good as another's. The point of my book is that this approach to the issue of staying home versus work leaves out the FACTS, which are knowable and very scary, and the consequences of staying home, which are devastatingly negative in the majority of cases when looked at over the span of a woman's entire lifetime. The title of my book, THE FEMININE MISTAKE, does NOT make a value judgment about the relative worthiness of the choice to stay home. What it does is to document the consequences of economic dependency, over a lifetime, for women who interrupt or terminate their workforce participation. I have spent the last year hearing from thousands of women who ended up impoverished and desperate because they counted on a husband to support them and lost that bet. I have also heard from countless adult children of stay-at-home mothers who have become dependent on their own kids, who are enraged at their mothers for not having taken responsibility for their own lives in a more pragmatic way. These personal testimonials are so heartbreaking, and these consequences are eminently avoidable, but not if women refuse to deal with the facts. It is not my opinion that women lose nearly 40 percent of their earning power if they take as little as three years out of the workforce; it is a FACT. It is not my opinion that twice as many older women end up in poverty compared with men; it is a FACT. It is not my opinion that four out of five of these older poor women WERE NOT POOR until they lost their breadwinner; it was depending on a husband to take care of them that plunged them into poverty. These and all the other facts in my book are painstakingly documented and footnoted, as is all the social research upon which my little series of ten reasons working women should feel good about themselves is based. But women continue to relate to this whole issue as if it's only a matter of their FEELINGS, which get hurt awfully easily, I must say. The actual facts are likely to have a terrible impact on their own futures, and those of their children, if ignored. Sticking your head in the sand is not, in most cases, a sensible way of preparing for various contingencies. Information is power, and I had hoped to share with working women -- for whom this site is ostensibly designed -- some reasons they should feel great about themselves for making that choice, instead of feeling what working women usually feel, which is guilty about all the cultural propaganda aimed at making them feel bad about themselves, which is so abundant in this society. So many working women have come up to me with tears in their eyes and told me that THE FEMININE MISTAKE was the single most validating book they've ever read in their lives. I am not "deriding" the decision made by so many women these days to stay home; I am only saying that economic dependency is a huge risk that is most likely to have unfortunate consequences for stay-at-home mothers and their children, and it's better to inform yourself about those FACTS than to remain ignorant or to ignore them. For this I've spent the last 12 months being attacked. All I can say at this point is that women are their own worst enemies. So sad.
I understand and appreciate Ms. Bennett's attempt to validate the decisions of working moms to work, truly. My issue with her position, which echoes the thoughts of other WIM members, stems from the mere title of her book - "The Feminine Mistake." This alone derides the decision made by SAHMs as somehow incorrect or socially or morally undesirable. Her choice of words and generalizations about SAHMs in her article above says to me that she does not respect the choice of some mothers to WORK by staying home to raise their children. She does not recognize that being a SAHM is a job, it is work that is valuable and deserves respect. Since when do SAHMs bake cookies and plant daffodils all day??

Some families cannot afford the high cost of daycare and it becomes one partner's job to stay home. In this case, making the decision about who will stay home is part of the responsibility of having children in the first place. It's not the right decision for some women, but neither is staying in any job that you don't find satisfying or enjoyable.

Working women in jobs they like are happier than women who reluctantly remain at home to raise children. Working women in jobs they don't like are less happy than women who freely choose to stay home with their children and find this fulfilling.
I have read the book, and I was very disappointed to see this author being *featured* on the site because she is so one-sided and continually belittles women who choose to stay at home or take time out of the workforce. Bashing these women is not helpful to the mothers who continue working full-time, either. What we need are articles offering helpful tips for our current situations and strategies for changing the larger culture to be more supportive of ALL mothers, whether working, at-home, or some combination in-between.
I'm not even going to read the comments here but I will say that Nataly's blog post is what got me to come back and read the article. You can see my comment to her over on her blog.

As for this article I say YAAY!

I could TOTALLY relate to your points. For me, personally, I can not IMAGINE being satisfied as a stay-home mother and every reason you listed is exactly why. I've been home with children at various points of my life - either I worked out of the home, I was home on a leave or I was unemployed. Let me tell you, full-time mommyhood is NOT for ME.

I love my career and guess what: I LOVE MY CHILDREN TOO! Oh yes, it is possible to be interested in and passionate about both.

I feel incredibly balanced (spiritually, mentally and in terms of time management). I do not feel like working full-time outside of the home makes me harried or stressed. Quite the opposite actually.

And to add to that, I am a single mother. I am not married, remarried or co-habitating.

Is my life perfect for everyone? Hells no. But it works for me and THAT is what matters most.

Great article. I'm looking forward to more.

Thanks, Leslie for contributing to WIM!!!
I'm with Lylah, Kate, Veronica, and the others who didn't really see this article as part of the "working/non-working" mom debate - but maybe I'm naive in that perception. As they've said, it's all work in one way or another.

I agree with those who've said that your happiness comes from HAVING the choice, and being able to act on it. Not everyone does.

Some moms do have to work to support their families, no matter what. And while we think less about this side, some moms are still prohibited from working due to repressive domestic/social situations.

I've always been a working mom, and I think it as better both for me and my son in many ways. It might not be better for someone else and her children. That's all subjective. I don't think there's one right or wrong way to do this, and the conflict comes up when we assume that there is.
I wrote an article on this us-them debate in January ( http://www.workitmom.com/article-1698) and the research shows that any amount of work, just a few hours a week, keep women - not just moms - women happier. Life satisfaction goes up. But there didn't seem to be a definition for work. Does organizing a bake sale or annual school gala count as work? To me - Hell yes!

I'm with some of the other moms who have commented. I couldn't stay home. I don't have the patience. Yes, the gods made us to make babies, but part of that idea is that we evolved to have babies and care for them. Well, I think I'd be that mama panda who ignores her cub if I had to stay home every day. UNLESS I was in her school volunteering (aka doing the work that the govt should be paying someone to do!) to bring in reading programs, raising money for science labs (can you believe we have to do that? dear lord!), or something like that.

My opinion...do what makes you happy. If staying at home does, don't feel guilty. If working does, don't feel guilty. Most women move in and out of the workforce, so most of us will log some time on both sides of the fence.

For those of you who are WAHMs...I salute you! I can barely write my monthly articles with the child around. haha! There's a reason women carry babies...we have too much to do to sit around.

Kate  14th Mar
ok so i posted first and then forgot to come back... WOW!

I am so saddened that people feel like they need to leave WIM because they featured an article with strong opinions! Aren’t we all grown-ups here? We should be able to maturely listen to the opinions of others even if they differ from our own. They are opinions. Sometimes they open your eyes to another point of view, sometimes they can just solidify your own view. Either way – how is this offensive? If we can’t openly discuss and encourage each other to speak freely about our opinions how can we learn and grow and empathize?

I don’t understand why people are offended that someone offered a strong opinion. There are bloggers here on the WIM Blogs that are very opinionated about things like politics or clothing or bacon or anything else of-the-moment and I don’t see people ‘disappointed’ at those opinions! I don’t eat meat – I am not offended by the bacon posts – I find them enjoyable! (even if the pictures kinda gross me out a little, I figure that’s my problem! I am not going to insist that pictures aren’t posted! They are part of the fun!  )

That said – my opinion is that my son is better off at his daycare than at home with me. They are trained extensively on how to teach the children at each stage of development. He has great peer interactions and loves going every day. We have a happy and well adjusted family with our arrangement.
The title is "10 Reasons Working Moms Should Feel Great about Themseves" not "... better than stay at home moms". I would love to see all moms feel great about their choices, and spend less energy on guilt and second guessing their choices. The bottom line is that some mothers are happier working and some mothers are happier not working. My hope is that each mother will have the confidence and the ability to make the choice that truly makes her happiest, so she can be the mother she wants to be . That is different for each individual.
I have not read the book, but I did see a few minutes of the author on a C-Span book review. She made some good points about when you leave the work force it is hard to get back in etc. However, I found her to be defensive when people questioned the idea of staying home. Maybe that was due to all the attacks that were made. I guess I really need to read the book to have a better opinion. Regardless of the book though I agree that you should do what makes you happy and that is that. It is up to you to do what is right for your family. There is no wrong answer in my opinion!
It doesn't matter whether she meant working at home or working outside. I work full time but frankly, even I felt that Work It, Mom should not have FEATURED this article. It could have been a link to start a debate. I love my work, I love the fact that I have a career, but you know what? The only reason I'm able to work outside the house is because I have my mom who takes care of my son. Despite the fact that we need the money, I would give up my career in a heartbeat if I felt my family needed me more. Professionally I'm very ambitious, but my family comes first.

I think Lylah's right when she points out about women being secure and fulfilled being happier than those who don't. Well my mom is one of those women, and she gave up her career when she got married. Does that mean she should feel less great about herself. In a word, NO.

Yes, times have changed, but working or not is a woman's choice. And yes, Non Toxic Mom correctly points out that men can't have children and there's a reason for that. We do have some fab dads and some fab stay-at-home dads, but it all boils down to personal choice.

I'm not dropping out of Work It, Mom. Not yet. But I must say I was greatly saddened to see this piece featured here.
I find most of these comments very offensive and im sure other readers feel the same...why is it that when a women writes an article about other women working that everyone is up in arms of course its all work i dont think the writter disputed that but her intention was to point out that most of society looks at woment who are working be it for financial or other reasons are seen to be bad mothers and the guilt involved in being a mother in an economy were it is almost impossible to be a SAHM still manages to make us feel like losers. I agree i think women were designed to be care givers i also agree thtat there a women who do not see themselves in the role. I dont honestly know if i could handle my two year old son all day every day - he is in daycare and he loves every minute of it, he is loved by all the teachers and assistance and they all know him by name. I feel bad that i am not the one able to provide him with the stimulation he would need if i was a SAHM and i would leave him in day care if i could afford to not work!! Does that make me a bad parent? I dont think so i think it makes me a parent who can make a disission that suits the needs of her family and i dont think i should be made to feel guilty for that decision!
Hmmm... I read "working mom" and assumed she meant moms who work, whether in or out of the home, in their own businesses or for someone else, as freelancers or as full-timers. It's all work, right?

I think that, in general, women who feel secure and fulfilled in their endeavors will be happier than those who don't. For some, this means working outside the home. For others, this means working from home. For still others, this means pursuing interests that have nothing to do with income but make them feel satisfied and engaged.

I'd be willing to bet there's a large percentage of women who work outside of the home because they have to, not because they want to, and those women are not going to be happier than the ones who get to do what they want to do with their lives.
It was my hope that this site would never get into this debate. I've enjoyed being here and learning from such intelligent women. I now find it sad that we have been somehow pitted against one another. I have very strong opinions about being home with my child. I believe it is what women were intended to do really. Men can't bear children and there's a reason for that. I'm fully aware that some women have to work. It is what our society has created, and personally I find it sad. I can't imagine what a different child my son would be if he were raised by someone else. Yes I said raised by someone else. Do we really believe we are raising children from 6pm - 8pm? I'm so sick and tired of hearing people say that stay at home mothers are bored and feel they should be doing more. If you're bored raising your own child, then there's a problem. Being a mother is the most important job a person can do. If you fail at it, then what else really matters? I could go on and on, but I'm not going to. This is something I feel so personally distraught about, it's hard for me to even express. It is my hope that someday more people will begin to realize just how important being a parent is. I truly believe this world will be a better place when we can all put our children before our own needs, and stop needing a pat on the back for every self-sacrificing thing we do. We have the power to change the world, if we would just stop the denial. My best wishes to all you wonderful, intelligent women who come to this site. I've so enjoyed your comments, articles and stories. Today will likely be my last visit though. I wish you all the best.
Sara  13th Mar
Like PunditMom, I'm wondering why we're still having this discussion. I find it troubling to generalize the term "happy" - how are we defining happiness among today's moms? I worked at a high-paced job for almost 2 years before I threw in the towel. I don't need to work, and so now I'm not. In fact, my stress level is down, I'm more relaxed and "happier" than I was when I was working. But my happiness might be different from the working mom next door or the stay at home mom down the street. I think that we all need to do what's good for ourselves, in the short or long term and not worry about generalizations to the general mothering population.
I agree that it's important not to base major life decisions on media reports (including books!) For many women, they are happier when they are working. For many women, they are happier when they are at home full-time with their kids. I am in full support of women (who can make a choice in the first place) to trust their own instincts and experience and do whatever works well for them and their individual families. It's true for many professions there aren't clear "on ramps" back into the workforce. There can be "penalties" in many professions for taking time out of them (loss of prestige, loss of earning power, etc.) For many women, that sacrifice is worth the experience they have as primary caretaker of their kids. It doesn't matter to me what percentage of women are happier at work vs. at home - what matters to me is my own individual experience.
To each his own on whether you want to work or not. Personally for me I am a much better Mom to my two kids working than I was when I stayed at home for a 1 1/2. I do not have guilt for pursuing something I went to school for and I love what I do. If you have a husband who is in full support of what you do and who helps out with the household chores then you can have a balanced life. It's not always easy but together as a team you can accomplish anything.
This is true for me. I took a year off work to stay home with my daughter and found I needed something else to focus on. I started my own business and now have the best of both worlds. I can stay involved with my profession and stay home with my (now) two daughters!
I have to disagree with the statement that working makes mothers happier, at least in my case. Not only am I guilty, I'm more stressed and less rested, which can turn into a short fuse and lack of energy....which brings us back to guilt and stress. It's a cycle that only a fraction of working mothers manage to avoid.

For me, working is a neccessity because I am a single mother. It doesn't make it any easier to come to terms with if it's the only option, let me tell you.

"Propaganda to stay home"... You chose to make babies. Why is it propaganda to think you should actually take care of them?
Amber  13th Mar
I agree with Joanne, however I also agree with Kate's comment. As a working mom, I feel extremely guilty for working (even though we have no choice financially--women will feel guilty no matter what they're doing!). So this does make me feel better/justified doing what I'm doing. I am constantly worrying about it so this takes a load off -- somewhat. : )
I totally agree with Joanne!!

This is absurd! Women are happier when they are doing what they WANT to do (just linke men), whether that is staying home, or going to work. For me, being away from my kids and letting someone else raise them was torture. My neighbor on the other hand, had a mental breakdown (literally) and had to get out of the house and go back to work to get it together.

Implying that any one solution is going to make me happier makes me sick. Why does it have to be an us versus them thing as far as working and stay at home moms go, and where does that leave WAHMs?!?

-Kristie
Can't we stop having this discussion that pits mother against mother against mother?? If working makes us happy, great. If staying home with our kids make us happy, great, too.

Why must we keep insisting there is a one size fits all prescription for happiness?

PunditMom
http://punditmom1.blogspot.com
Kate  12th Mar
I am so excited for this series! I completely agree - I think in the long run I am much more sane/productive/positive person (mom) working than not. I don't really understand the propeganda to stay home... it's great for some but not for everyone!
Can't wait for Reson Number Two!
You May Also Like...
What Worked and Works for Me
Florinda Pendley Vasquez | 15th Mar
Staying Balanced in a Busy World
April Mims, Career Coach | 22nd Dec 07
Member articles represent the subjective opinion of that member or author, and not that of Work It, Mom! LLC.