with

Magazines Demystified!

Categories: celebrities, magazines, music

11 comments

In my efforts to keep up with what the all the kids are hip to these days, I fished a couple of magazines out of the airport garbage when we were traveling last week: Esquire and Spin.

esquire_spin.jpg

VoilĂ . And by “the kids” of course I mean, The Boys, and whichever of The Girls is hearty enough to wade through a longish profile of Angelina Jolie written by Tom Junod, a man apparently baffled to find that Ms. Jolie is a woman of actual character and not a 24-hour-a-day sex bomb. Esquire is all about taking half-naked women seriously. I let my subscription lapse several years ago when their admittedly annoying “we’re better than you” editorial voice slipped into the chasm of casual lad mag sexism — they also weren’t submitting to my demand that they replace their editor with David Sedaris. I have to say, though, at least they’re equal-opportunity sexists. They did a piece on Kevin Spacey a few years ago that was relentless in its speculation as to whether Spacey was gay or not. High-minded fashion lit apparently goes down a lot easier with a big helping of What’s In Your Pants?

Spin, on the other hand, is exactly the same. They would have us believe that all Amy Winehouse wants to do is smooch on her fiancĂ©, get drunk, and humiliate the man they sent to write her profile for them. There’s more to the article, sure, but it’s a personality piece, and as such tells us one heck of a lot about the writer’s personality. Editors of music magazines want their writers to write about a musician’s personal life because writing about the music they make is, in my estimation, flat-out impossible. To quote former iconoclast Laurie Anderson, writing about music is like dancing about architecture — in the venn diagram of arts, there isn’t a lot of overlap here, because even though language is used in pop music, music itself is a language that can’t be put into words. In other words, they always get it wrong.

In conclusion I would like to say that magazines are full of crap, but they sure do have a lot of pretty pictures of half-undressed ladies in them. The end.

Subscribe to blog via RSS
Share this on:

Your Comment

Will be shown publicly

NOTE: All fields marked * are required.

11 comments so far...

  • I only wish Junod had found a way to talk more about the luminosity of Jolie’s skin, or the fact that she’s now officially thinner than a praying mantis. I didn’t feel like two pages was nearly enough, personally. I did like the “look, she’s redirected The Crazy” angle, though. Very inspiring.

    Erin  |  July 26th, 2007 at 7:30 pm

  • Isn’t this supposed to be called FLAT pop? Not FLAP pop?
    Anyway, love your writing, Mrs. K. I will follow you anywhere.
    xoxo

    SuzieQ  |  July 26th, 2007 at 8:01 pm

  • Oh Jesus, SuzieQ. I am so horrified. Yes, it is supposed to be FlaT pop. The proper people have been notified.

    Thanks for the catch!

    jcreer  |  July 26th, 2007 at 9:47 pm

  • I’m distracted by that incredibly hot photo of Angelina.

    erika  |  July 27th, 2007 at 12:08 pm

  • Funny. I find myself wanting to rip the sheet away from Angelina (that IS a sheet, right? is that a dress?!) to see if she would cover her parts with those gargantuan hands, yet I want to help Amy put her straps back on (because she’s probably too drunk to do it herself).

    Hooray! Another place to visit Mrs. Kennedy!

    Angela  |  July 27th, 2007 at 6:48 pm

  • I appreciate your comments on pop culture that has eluded my grasp. I have a 3 year old and an almost 6 year old and identifying the moment of the death of my cultural participation is very easy.

    I think your last sentence wants to say “pretty pictures OF half-undressed ladies” but they probably have pretty pictures of other things too.
    Smooches.

    Jenine  |  July 27th, 2007 at 8:38 pm

  • Another typo! Thanks!

    edenk  |  July 27th, 2007 at 8:44 pm

  • Angelina’s boobs look really weird in that photo. But I can’t turn away.

    Lisa  |  July 30th, 2007 at 1:27 pm

  • I think you’re right, David Sedaris could fix all of this.

    mikaela  |  July 30th, 2007 at 1:57 pm

  • i find that Angelina tends to dominate any mag she is in…. understandably so… I mean i look at men reading these mags and after they are done looking at her pics - they just put it quietly away!!!

    Victoria  |  July 30th, 2007 at 8:16 pm

  • I would like to suggest Bust Magazine as a fabulous alternative to the more traditional women’s lifestyle mags out there. It rocks!

    http://www.bust.com

    Susan  |  August 9th, 2007 at 8:19 pm

Have a question?

Check out our popular Q&A area to ask questions and search for answers.

Quick recipes

Check out our favorite quick and easy recipes, perfect for busy moms.

Affordable Luxuries Blog

Check out our daily picks for affordable luxuries for you and your family.