Hillary’s cleavage? John McCain’s “gay” sweater?
I’m trying to sort out my feelings about two articles in major newspapers this week about the presidential candidates and their physical attributes, as well as the contents of their closets. Initially, I thought that no one would include personal grooming habits in the calculation of whether a candidate should be President of the United States, but I could be wrong.
The Washington Post weighed in on Hillary’s cleavage this week and the New York Times tackled the weighty subject of the candidates’ wardrobe selections. I had no idea there was a “gay” sweater look that John McCain was sporting! Of course, just for the sake of fun, I can’t leave out John Edwards YouTube hair crisis as long as I’m talking about outward appearances.
If this is what campaign reporting is going to be about in the coming months, then it’s time for me to tune out. But, on the other hand, there is yet another Democratic “debate” scheduled for this week, and you know that someone will ask about whether Hillary’s low V-neck wardrobe choice was simply a nod to the summer heat or whether she was trying to make a power statement — maybe someone was doubting that she really was a woman under those sensible suits she’s been sporting?
Discussing some of these things at dinner Saturday night, one friend, when he found out that I like John Edwards as a candidate, asked me if I had seen the YouTube video of Edwards’ hair grooming episode. Of course I had read about it, but I hadn’t taken the time to click over to watch. It just seemed to silly to spend my time on. This friend said that as a result of that two minutes of candid pre-interview primping, he would not consider voting for Edwards and claimed that I would immediately reverse my stance if I saw it, saying, “No one who spends that much time on his hair would ever get my vote to be President of the United States.”
Well, I watched and I still like Edwards. Presidential candidates are people too, complete with quirks and idiosyncracies.
But I’m now more worried than before. I’m not casting my vote based on Miss America criteria. But apparently many in the news media think that we do and at least one voter in my part of the world is doing just that.
So if that’s the case, here’s my solution — replace the Electoral College with the Queer Eye guys — they’re the experts on all the fashion do’s and don’ts, and I bet they have some interesting things to say on the issues, as well!
Subscribe to blog via RSS



I’m at least happy that the wardrobes of male candidates are being discussed - usually the media talks about what women candidates are wearing (there was tons of this coverage when Nancy Pelosi ran) and what male candidates are doing or saying.
Nataly | July 23rd, 2007 at 2:36 pm
I can believe it. Remember when the critics made the big fuss over the jewelry Nancy Pelosi wore when she took over as Speaker? I mean, seriously. Anything to generate controversy!
Selfmademom | July 24th, 2007 at 7:46 pm
I’m still laughing!
Annemarie | August 27th, 2007 at 6:55 am
Queer Eye’s Carson was on celebrity Jeopardy, and he seemd like a rather knowledgable guy. Well, considering the dumbed-down celebrity questions/answers, that is.
Daisy | November 16th, 2007 at 3:28 am
How can we calculate
webmaster | February 19th, 2008 at 6:46 am