

The Work It, Mom! Blog
with Nataly
Hi, I am Nataly and I am the co-founder of Work It, Mom!
I write the daily Work It, Mom! Blog where I talk about issues affecting working moms, goings on in our Work It, Mom! community, new site features, updates,and contests. I also share my own juggle between work and family and love to see members jump in with comments. Come and visit often!
Nataly's profile on Work It, Mom!
I’ve written often on this blog about flexibility and work. As a working mom, it’s an endless struggle to juggle my career and my family and I’ve only been able to do it because of having some flexibility with my work schedules. Depending on where I’ve worked, I’ve either been able to work from home some of the time or leave earlier than normal on some days and continue to work after my daughter is asleep. (I’ve never worked part-time and while sometimes I think that may be the ultimate way to “balance” work and family, I’ve heard from enough women about their part-time work experiences that would suggest this arrangement is far from ideal.)
The current economic recession is scary on many levels but one aspect about it that’s stressing me out is its potential effect on flexibility at work. As employers cut jobs and tighten their belts, will those who work on flexible schedules — including part-time — be the first to go? There’s some evidence that this is happening, according to this article in the Wall Street Journal, and I know of two moms who were laid off and believe they were chosen because they work part-time. If employers use the old-school face-time criteria to decide who stays and who goes, part-timers, telecommuters, and those with flexible schedules are in trouble.
But perhaps instead of stressing about what this recession will do to work flexibility I should be encouraged. Part-timers and telecommuters are often cheaper to employ — in tough economic times, will there be more opportunities to create work schedules that work with our lives? The same Wall Street Journal article highlights some instances where this has been the case: “Based on an April survey by Towers Perrin of 700 employers, 21% to 32% are either implementing or considering part-time shifts or four-day workweeks, as a cost-cutting tool.” (Of course, as the article points out, employees may not have a choice in this case.)
I’m curious about your experiences and what you’re seeing out there — how is the recession affecting either your work flexibility (if you have any) or that of your friends or colleagues? Are you putting in more face time at the office to reduce your chances of getting laid off? If you work part-time or telecommute, have you made an extra effort to spend time in the office?
Subscribe to blog via RSS



I was recently (last week) laid off from a position that I only started 6 months ago. A position I left a very stable job for. It was a 32 hour position, which included about 10 hours telecommuting. Clearly, it was a very flexible work schedule. But despite the 32 hours I was always “on” - just not in the office. I do think this made a difference when the tough decisions needed to be made about which positions to cut.
I am hoping though that other companies looking for a more cost effective way to get things done, may see my ideal schedule as a win for them as well. We’ll see……..
Wendy | April 27th, 2009 at 5:52 pm
I wonder how much it’s about face time, and how much it’s about stupid management pressure to cut “headcount” rather than cost — if it counts the same towards my targets to cut someone who does 24 hours of week as someone who does 40 hours of work, and no one’s offering to take work off my team’s plate, it becomes harder to chose the full-timer.
Emily | April 28th, 2009 at 4:21 pm