5Most Popular Debates

No debates to show.
Sign up for the Work It, Mom! Newsletter!
Featured Blogs
The 36-Hour Day
I don't know how to juggle this one
Committed: The Ties that Bond
Secrets To A Happy Marriage
Full Time, All the Time
Resignation: happy trails
The Working Closet
Shop your own closet. (Part One.)
The Work It, Mom! Blog
The awesomeness of working with women
Working (On) Motherhood
Office Ergonomics
Work It, Dad!
Who's the Police in Your Home?
Devil's Advocate

Is Blogging a Legitimate Form of Journalism?

Blogging is Too Personal to be Considered True Journalism

While waiting to see my therapist this afternoon, I picked up the current issue of Newsweek. I've been mulling over this very post for days now, so I couldn't help but notice the article, "My Shrink Says… Blog."

Blogging "is a creative outlet," according to writer Jessica Bennett . "It's a forum to vent… To mental health experts, it's more than that: a blog is medicine."

I know, the fact that I'm reading this in the therapist's waiting room is very ironic. But I couldn't agree with Ms. Bennett more.

First, a little history:

I live online. I've written a daily blog for more than two years. I wake up in the middle of the night outlining my next post. Then, I get out of bed around 6 every morning -- before the kid rises -- to have my coffee and read blogs. I devour the Huffington Post and have written for the site. I get MomLogic.com Twitters throughout the day. You get the picture.

I'm also a journalist. After dropping about of college, I pestered a local newspaper until they hired me as a reporter at age 20. (I later returned to college and earned my journalism degree.) My managing editor was hard core. He demanded that I triple-check sources and go to the "scene of the crime" when possible.

I learned the rules: how to research and verify sources, how to use correct grammar and spelling. This is what a journalist does.

Bloggers not do make the same tough, tiresome effort that journalists do. I don't know a blogger who fact-checks or verify sources, do you? You're lucky enough to get through a blog without running into a misspelling or grammatical error.

Bloggers do not strive for accuracy. Bloggers write to vent -- and to share some link love, if they're generous.
This is precisely why blogging is not legitimate journalism. It's all personal. You can call someone an a-hole. You gush about your last date. There are no rules in blogging to prove you're accurate. There is no managing editor to keep you in check.
No, I'm not talking about the horde of "news blogs" out there, like MSNBC, Fox News, San Jose Mercury News. These are news outlets which run online copy of news stories that have been (hopefully) fact-checked. I'm talking about your Dooce-kind-of blog, which is a creative outlet.

When the University of California at Berkeley's Graduate School of Journalism, which is right down the road from me, started offering a blogging course in 2002, I thought it was ridiculous. A blogging course should be offered in computer studies -- not in the journalism department.

Granted, journalism as we've known it over the last few decades has changed dramatically -- and I'm all for change. Reporters everywhere are questioning, "Who is a real journalist?" That's their job. The Media Bloggers Association is dealing with many headaches on this issue. No doubt, the Internet has changed journalism forever.

Now, if you want to know why I still need to see a therapist if I'm blogging every day… that's another post altogether.


No, Rachel Sarah did not verify any facts about her ex-boyfriends when she wrote her book, Single Mom Seeking: Play Dates, Blind Dates, and Other Dispatches from the Dating World.

But her ex-boyfriends occasionally wonder if she's completely accurate about the facts on her blog, www.singlemomseeking.com.


Blogging is Cutting-Edge Journalism

Blogging is not only legitimate journalism, it's the cutting edge of journalism! It's reported by the hour, by the minute, sometimes by the second. There is no other way to disseminate news faster and more efficiently to a wider audience than blogging, not to mention all the linking and surfing you can do to research your subject of choice further. There is no limit to the information you can communicate through blogging. If that's not journalism, then I don't know what is.

If you really want to know what is going on in the world (ie: the NEWS), you either need to subscribe to about 80 newspapers (and good luck finding ones from third-world countries) or read about a thousand blogs every day! I vote for blogs. I've never been a fan of inky fingers.

"In the multitude of ideas there is truth." I don't know who said it. I've long forgotten all the dates and names I memorized so judiciously for that History of Mass Com class that I got a "C" in back in college but the statement has stuck with me through time. You cannot get a clear picture of the world by listening to the five o'clock news. Stations are politically slanted, stories are picked up and dropped in order fit schedules or bow to local political pressures. If you really want to know the truth you can find it, right here on the internet, one blog at a time.

Blogging may be considered "gonzo journalism" with its use of the first person and tendency to take tangents off in unpredictable directions but that is exactly what I like about it as a news source and I think that's what Americans want and need right now too. The old-school style of reporting is classy and efficient but it's lacking that personal element to hold an audience. There is so much effort put into form and trying to please an audience it has lost its down-and-dirty level with the truth.

I had the privilege of talking with the vice-president of Merrill Lynch the other day. When I mentioned that I was a blogger he laughed and told me that blogs are actually quite important to them as investors. "If you really want to know how a company is doing," he said, "you read blogs about it. You can read their annual report, you can talk to their vendors but you'll find the truth in blogs. By the time you hear insider-trading news from your hair dresser or taxi driver that's the time to sell." Good to know, I say. Even the experts are reading blogs to keep their finger on the pulse of what is important and happening now.

On another level (one that I'm ashamed to admit I'm a bit of an expert on) what about gossip blogs? These days when I hit the checkout line at the grocery store, I rarely even glimpse at the tabloid headlines. It's old news! Lindsay Lohan's dating a girl? I knew that months ago. What a waste of paper. Save a tree and read a blog.

Blogging is where it's at. I don't even watch TV anymore. Between commercials and the never-ending lead-up/rehash of headlines that take up more time than the story itself, I've long gotten bored and left the room.

So maybe Hollywood gossip is not your thing. I wish it weren't mine. But that is yet another beautiful thing about blogging. You find the news that fits YOU. You like to read happy news? You want a puff piece about your local library or crafts to do with your kids on a long summer afternoon? Let me lead you to a few blogrolls. If you're reading this, you already know what I'm talking about.

Blogging is about community. Journalism is the process of collecting and publishing news for the community--but blogging takes it one step further. It adds discussion. Editors might take a back seat and you might have to put up with a few more typos but I dare you to read a blog about abortion or depression or breastfeeding and not appreciate the variety and well-thought-out opinions that take place in comment boxes.

If journalism started back in olden times with villagers leaving messages for each other on trees in common meeting grounds, then blogging is just an extension of that. Blogs (which are really just journals) are a way for people to fill the need to communicate with each other. Blogging is journalism, it just looks different.

Brenda is an artist, illustrator, and secret agent living in California. She is also a beloved and renowned blogger, you can find her at www.secret-agent-josephine.com/blog.

What do you think?
Rating: 2.5 (based on 0 reviews)
Sign up or Log in to rate!
Spread the word!
Please sign into your account or join Work It, Mom! to leave a comment.
Comments
All blogs are not created equal. Would you compare Newsweek with The National Inquirer? Both magazines, but vastly different. Blogs tend to be opinion-based, from what I have seen. Very few are actually well-researched works of journalism. I would be hesitant to get my "news" from such a source.
hi rachel,I'm more of a broadcast journalist but I'm into print journalism which is really my passion...I agree with you when you say that blogging isn't a real journalism which we know is something we learn from Journalism course with proper on-the-job trainings that well sometimes started with just making a cup of coffee for the editors!! Journalism is an art and a science. It's a tough profession and here in the Philippines the fourth state is media profession.It's a profession that requires mind and heart and even soul to connect with audience and readers.It's a passion that pays and with a mission to share and deliver.
But then, I find blogging as a form of easy and light SMALL TALK over matters that we do everyday. As I enjoy reading and sharing, I believe it's a form of creative and positive forum of emotions of people who want to share and care. It's the part of journalism that tackles the human drama and emotions and well a form of feature in journalism industry. it's like encouraging our readers to impart and give feedbacks on what we write...and in not so serious talks...but educating us, entertaining us and informing us.
@Ghost: Plenty of bloggers do check their facts, but the question for the audience is, "How do I know the blogger I'm reading is among them?" Professional journalists are both trained and required to do so, and their audience can depend on that. The same is not true for bloggers across the board.
As a marketer, blogging to me is self serving of the blogger. Its an op ed piece. Although, don't shoot the tool - the blog.

I agree with Rachel. Journalism is about facts, accuracy. A journalism piece represents information in an unbiased manner allowing the reader/listener to make up their own mind. Blogging is generally a marketing and propaganda outlet. Or, a way to connect and have a public diary.

I think blogs can be an outlet for journalism, but with all the opinion out there from blogging, it's shot down the value of the tool. You can say that news shows today aren't journalism either when they sport a political or other agenda. They try to tell you what to think. Again, the newspaper, tv, radio, or website is a tool. Many times they are true to journalistic values. But there appears to be a real change even in these venues.

I think there is a real art, structure, and integrity to real journalism that the majority of time is not a part of blogging. It is a shame that bloggers that try to stay true to this are discredited by a lot of hear-say, opinion, and hidden agendas.

Sometimes it is nice not to always have, "Listen to me! Hear what I have to say!" I think journalism in its true form is about, "Do you want to know something? What do you think of that?"
Leah  10th Jul
I agree with Brenda: blogging IS journalism, it just looks different. That said, I also think it is (and should be) used differently by its audience. I would never, for instance, rely on only one or even a handful of personal blogs to get the most accurate information on a current event that is also being covered by professional journalists with credentials and teams behind them, just the way I wouldn't rely solely on The Colbert Report for my news. Every source has if not an agenda at least a limited p.o.v., and I believe that the best way to get the most complete story is to hear from multiple sources, and multiple TYPES of sources--from CNN to the concerned citizen down the street blogging from her laptop in bed--and take all of that information into account (albeit to varying degrees considering the source). So although I would never count on blogs to be my sole source of news, neither would I rely on just "professional" journalism. Even the little voices have something to add to the discussion--whether bloggers or their commenters--and I think to discount that is to discount the community at large.
Bok  9th Jul
As a TV journalist I'm firmly in the "blogging isn't journalism" camp- unless of course it's a journalism blog.

I've often struggled with definitions of what makes a journalist, and after several years of making current affairs TV I've made up my mind.

The distinction is not just about spelling and grammar (neither of which apply to TV). Journalism is governed by media law, ethical codes and- in the case of the BBC, where I work- very strict editorial guidelines concerning neutrality, accuracy and fairness. Crucially, we can and should be held accountable, by law and by our audiences, for the stories we tell and how we tell them. This is what governs our content and this is what makes us journalists.

The Ghost: Thanks for pointing out that every journalist needs a good copy editor, too.

I just proved my own point re: making grammatical errors when you're writing a rushed blog entry (which this is). Thanks!

So, yes, to one who "fact-checks or verifies sources..."

And: "After dropping out of college..."

All media and news outlets are expressing an opinion. Anyone who has ever read People Magazine (pretty sure the writers would call themselves such "journalists"), or watched Fox News knows that media outlets express opinions. Even the New York Times and CNN have a slant. Sometimes you have to read between the lines to see it, but often it's clearly there.

Bloggers' personal connections to the stories they cover often only add strength and passion to their writing, rather than diminish the reality of their findings and experiences.

Plenty of bloggers also check facts, and plenty of them get their stories more accurate than a local or national newspaper might.

Every local newspaper I've ever subscribed to has an entire section devoted to mistakes, and apologizing for them. Mistakes in reporting and spelling and grammar that are made every single week, by myriad journalists.

It's also interesting to me how in a pro-journalist article boasting statements like "I learned the rules: how to research and verify sources, how to use correct grammar and spelling. This is what a journalist does," and, "You're lucky enough to get through a blog without running into a misspelling or grammatical error," one can also find sentences boasting misspellings and grammatical errors.

Like this one: "I don't know a blogger who fact-checks or verify sources, do you?" Or this one: "I'm also a journalist. After dropping about of college..."

Ah, how I do love me some situational irony.
After I wrote this, I thought of all kinds of holes in my argument and really I think it all comes down to how you define the word "journalism" itself. Blogging may not be up to today's standard of journalism but I think someday it will. I think blogging is going to be a big chapter in the history of journalism.
Carly, Rachel Sarah is a journalist.
I don't think there is a legitimate argument on either side unless it's performed by actual journalists.

True journalism is the unbiased reporting of facts, using several different sources. If there is a parallel in the journalism industry to blogs, I'd say personal columns are the closest. But those are just that -- someone's personal opinion about something.

As Brenda says: Blogs...are really just journals.

(Yes, I am a bona fide, trained, cynical Canadian journalist of 15 years. And yes, I blog, too. But I've never called it journalism.)