There's a very interesting article on MSNBC's website about how did WE survive growing up, without all the warning labels, helmets, precautions that seem to have overshadowed our lives and that of our childrens.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31670059/ns/health-kids_and_parenting/
One of the people interviewed raises a VERY good point - “We survived those years because we were allowed to live,” said the 47-year-old mortgage industry worker. “Too much effort is spent protecting us from ourselves these days that we don't just go out and live. This is particularly true of children. Who would have thought 30 years ago that it would be necessary to run public service announcements encouraging parents to get their kids outside playing?”
I'm not disagreeing with the fact that time/progress has brought about better things and made a lot of us healthier. But in the process, have we actually forgotten how to LIVE? Are we, in the process, also sheltering our children from experiences because of OUR fears in such a manner that they're really missing out on life?”
Asked by JKLD on 6th July 2009 |
9 replies
9 replies so far...
So yes to answer your question - Most people do shelter there children from experiencing life because they are afraid of the "what if" that society has laid at our feet. But its hard to decide when your weighing your options when it comes to your little boy or girl. In this day and age - I'm not going to let my little girl or boy walk to the store or ride their bike by themselves like I use too when I was 11-12 but I am going to let my kids play hide and seek in the front yard or street hockey - just tell them what we were told Watch for Cars and get out of the street when they come your way. These are just a few examples out of the thousands that you could be referring to. Good question - I enjoyed reading all the answers
Flag as inappropriate Posted by Mandy on 28th July 2009
Flag as inappropriate Posted by SKL on 9th July 2009
Flag as inappropriate Posted by oceans mom on 9th July 2009
So seatbelts, choking hazards, lead-based paint warnings are reasonable IMO.
OTOH, we have to teach our children what is reasonable in areas of health, consumption, polite behavior, etc. One person's reasonable is not the same as another person's.
Personally, I think many have gone overboard in the safety zone. I don't mind some bumps and bruises, and let my kids try many things on their own.
My nanny treats my children very very carefully, as does my mother in law. While I get frustrated by their ultra-cautious attitudes some times, I suppose I'd rather that the bumps and bruises happen "on my watch". So I can appreciate the issue from many perspectives!
Flag as inappropriate Posted by spacegeek on 8th July 2009
Flag as inappropriate Posted by Phe on 7th July 2009
Flag as inappropriate Posted by oceans mom on 7th July 2009
Flag as inappropriate Posted by oceans mom on 7th July 2009
That article really struck a chord with me because I see too many over-protective parents whose kids really are so dependent on their parents that they literally don't know how to do things for themselves. And then it really does bleed over into their adult years because a lot of these same kids have no earthly idea of responsiblity because the parents have always done everything for them.
Flag as inappropriate Posted by JKLD on 6th July 2009
Flag as inappropriate Posted by SKL on 6th July 2009